| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i9-13900K


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.8 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
b0671
Core
Alder Lake-P
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
24/32
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.94k
9.77k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
24.52k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.27k
17.17k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
21.37k (x1.57)
TOTAL
50.27k
72.83k (x1.45)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
44.01k
145.21k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
125.05k
444.95k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76.28k
318.3k (x4.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
27.2k (x1.75)
TOTAL
260.85k
935.66k (x3.59)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
31.93k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
23.88k
31.54k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.75k
18.8k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
20.82k (x1.52)
TOTAL
73.05k
103.09k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
151.95k
522.07k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
160.95k
584.17k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.9k
344.38k (x4.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.91k
25.36k (x1.59)
TOTAL
413.72k
1475.97k (x3.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
31.8k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
32.83k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
18.37k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
21.13k (x1.59)
TOTAL
73.92k
104.13k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
532.97k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
596.78k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
342.96k (x4.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
28.6k (x1.83)
TOTAL
419.25k
1501.31k (x3.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
58.6k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
33.29k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
17.77k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
19.49k (x1.48)
TOTAL
91.45k
129.15k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
804.04k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
613.45k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
311.08k (x4.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
34.5k (x2.14)
TOTAL
468.3k
1763.08k (x3.76)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4