| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i5-13400


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
b06f2
Core
Alder Lake-P
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
10/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
47.01k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
26.73k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
14.28k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
12.1k (x0.92)
TOTAL
91.45k
100.11k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
228.2k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
160.28k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
71.12k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
38.23k (x2.38)
TOTAL
468.3k
497.83k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4