| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i7-11700F


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-P
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
32.55k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
26.95k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
10.76k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
19.32k (x1.47)
TOTAL
91.45k
89.58k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
232.06k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
203.56k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
72.89k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
3.81k (x0.24)
TOTAL
468.3k
512.32k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4