| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i5-11300H


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-P
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/8
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
25.83k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
23.56k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
9.2k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
5.06k (x0.38)
TOTAL
91.45k
63.64k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
116.87k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
121.08k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
41.8k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6k (x0.37)
TOTAL
468.3k
285.75k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4