| | | | | | |

Core i7-1280P vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1280P gets a score of 468.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 3.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806c1
Core
Alder Lake-P
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
14/20
2/4
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.45k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
468.3k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.94k
3.75k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
17.22k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.27k
9.79k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.6k
8.21k (x0.6)
TOTAL
50.27k
38.97k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
44.01k
9.19k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
125.05k
35.47k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
76.28k
19.14k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.52k
5.82k (x0.38)
TOTAL
260.85k
69.62k (x0.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
12.9k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.88k
21.4k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.75k
10.73k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
8.16k (x0.6)
TOTAL
73.05k
53.19k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
151.95k
30.31k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
160.95k
45.13k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.9k
20.17k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.91k
5.77k (x0.36)
TOTAL
413.72k
101.38k (x0.25)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.76k
14.65k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
21.57k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.64k
9.93k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
8.02k (x0.6)
TOTAL
73.92k
54.18k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
149.83k
32.14k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
170.43k
43.54k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.32k
19.58k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.67k
5.61k (x0.36)
TOTAL
419.25k
100.87k (x0.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
39.78k
24.25k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
26.06k
21.63k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
9.09k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.17k
7.23k (x0.55)
TOTAL
91.45k
62.19k (x0.68)

Multithread

i7-1280P

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
209.96k
56.9k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
170.21k
55.68k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.04k
19.29k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
6.09k (x0.38)
TOTAL
468.3k
137.96k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7499 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6079 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2573 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
575 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
16725 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1280P
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8287 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2744 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
19051 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4