| | | | | | |

Core i7-12800H vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
369.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
26.28k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
23.38k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
5.52k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
12.96k (x1.31)
TOTAL
67.13k
68.14k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-12800H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
163.67k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
159.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
39k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
7.56k (x0.39)
TOTAL
467.41k
369.97k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i7-12800H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4