Core i7-12800H vs i3-9100
Description
The i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 2 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 2 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
906eb
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
229.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
28.03k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
24.5k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
5.73k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
8.48k (x0.86)
TOTAL
67.13k
66.74k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-12800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
107.5k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
95.11k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
22.02k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
4.57k (x0.24)
TOTAL
467.41k
229.2k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i7-12800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4