Core i7-12800H vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i7-12800H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a20f12
Core
Alder Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
32768 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
22.73k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
24.59k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
11.44k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
25.03k (x2.54)
TOTAL
67.13k
83.79k (x1.25)
Multithread
i7-12800H
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
134.28k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
178.56k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
78.16k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
38.26k (x1.98)
TOTAL
467.41k
429.25k (x0.92)
Performance/W
i7-12800H
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4