Core i7-12800H vs i5-12400F
Description
Both models i7-12800H and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12800H gets a score of 467.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
90675
Core
Alder Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280/2x2048 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.13k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.41k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.42k
33.85k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
18.93k
20.33k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
10.51k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.86k
11.77k (x1.19)
TOTAL
67.13k
76.46k (x1.14)
Multithread
i7-12800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
205.57k
174.21k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
159.7k
141.31k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82.78k
64.86k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.36k
19.01k (x0.98)
TOTAL
467.41k
399.39k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i7-12800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3549 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1840 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
430 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
10387 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5921 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3944 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2066 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2055 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13986 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4