| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700KF vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-12700KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700KF gets a score of 1018.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700KF is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280/2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
16386 kB
Date
November 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
111.27k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
1018.31k points
390.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
53.63k
28.39k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
29.55k
24.89k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.21k
5.78k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.88k
13.19k (x1.02)
TOTAL
111.27k
72.25k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-12700KF

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
465.61k
180.2k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
367.26k
163.51k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.92k
40.6k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.52k
6.48k (x0.32)
TOTAL
1018.31k
390.78k (x0.38)

Performance/W
i7-12700KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3725 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2938 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1319 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
8146 points/W
6012 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10726 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5910 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3041 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2577 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
22255 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4