| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700KF vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i7-12700KF is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700KF gets a score of 1018.3 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700KF is 1.4 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
806d0
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
12/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280/2048 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
111.27k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
1018.31k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700KF
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
53.63k
30.84k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
29.55k
26.38k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.21k
12.66k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.88k
11.74k (x0.91)
TOTAL
111.27k
81.62k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-12700KF

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
465.61k
294.86k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
367.26k
280.92k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.92k
113.9k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.52k
20.16k (x0.98)
TOTAL
1018.31k
709.85k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-12700KF
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3725 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2938 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1319 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
8146 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700KF
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
10726 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5910 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3041 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2577 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
22255 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4