| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700KF vs i5-12400F


Description
Both models i7-12700KF and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700KF gets a score of 1018.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700KF is 2.5 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
90675
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280/2048 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
18432 kB
Date
November 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
111.27k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1018.31k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700KF
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
53.63k
33.85k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
29.55k
20.33k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.21k
10.51k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.88k
11.77k (x0.91)
TOTAL
111.27k
76.46k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-12700KF

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
465.61k
174.21k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
367.26k
141.31k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164.92k
64.86k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.52k
19.01k (x0.93)
TOTAL
1018.31k
399.39k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i7-12700KF
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3725 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2938 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1319 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
8146 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700KF
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10726 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5910 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3041 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2577 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
22255 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4