| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700K vs i9-10900K


Description
The i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700K gets a score of 1034.1 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700K is 1.5 times faster than the i9-10900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0655
Core
Alder Lake
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/20
10/20
TDP
190 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+4x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
110.2k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1034.06k points
685.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
52.13k
32.67k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
28.97k
28.49k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.04k
6.53k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.07k
12.72k (x0.9)
TOTAL
110.2k
80.41k (x0.73)

Multithread

i7-12700K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
458.8k
307.39k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
377.45k
298.47k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
171.31k
72.94k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.51k
6.85k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1034.06k
685.65k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i7-12700K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2415 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1987 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
902 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5442 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10425 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3008 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2813 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
22040 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4