| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
50654
Core
Alder Lake-H
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
115 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-12700H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
7.95k
3k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.74k
12.29k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.29k
3.64k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.97k
6.55k (x0.44)
TOTAL
55.95k
25.46k (x0.46)

Multithread

i7-12700H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
53.64k
20.42k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
171.15k
95.83k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.92k
30.88k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.24k
9.7k (x1.05)
TOTAL
328.95k
156.83k (x0.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
18.78k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
16.25k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
3.99k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
6.8k (x0.53)
TOTAL
93.12k
45.82k (x0.49)

Multithread

i7-12700H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
133.55k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
108.43k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
30.02k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
9.48k (x0.9)
TOTAL
643.29k
281.48k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4