| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 564.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1 times faster than the E5-2680 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
306e4
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
14/20
10 /20
TDP
115 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-12700H
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
24.26k
11.96k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
24.03k
10.73k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
4.59k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.08k
4.31k (x0.36)
TOTAL
75.12k
31.6k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-12700H

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
199.99k
218.24k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
218.01k
206.92k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.62k
100.37k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.42k
11.45k (x1.22)
TOTAL
530.04k
536.99k (x1.01)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
10.55k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
10.02k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
3.99k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
3.66k (x0.26)
TOTAL
80.58k
28.23k (x0.35)

Multithread

i7-12700H

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
215.04k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
230.43k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
96.87k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
8.76k (x0.92)
TOTAL
564.12k
551.1k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1770 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
881 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
4905 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5492 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5570 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3130 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2953 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
17145 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4