Core i7-12700H vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 564.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.5 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 564.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.5 times faster than the E5-2620. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
206d7
Core
Alder Lake-H
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
6.95k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
6.24k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
3.05k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
2.56k (x0.18)
TOTAL
80.58k
18.8k (x0.23)
Multithread
i7-12700H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
90.01k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
82.43k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
42.59k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
9.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
564.12k
224.7k (x0.4)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
1770 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
881 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
4905 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
5492 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5570 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3130 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2953 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
17145 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4