Core i7-12700H vs i5-10400T
Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.95k
4k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.74k
14.19k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.29k
4.62k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.97k
11.03k (x0.74)
TOTAL
55.95k
33.84k (x0.6)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
53.64k
22.77k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
171.15k
96.59k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.92k
31.65k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.24k
2.45k (x0.27)
TOTAL
328.95k
153.46k (x0.47)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.26k
12.61k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.03k
17.94k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
4.83k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.08k
10.81k (x0.9)
TOTAL
75.12k
46.19k (x0.61)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
199.99k
74.62k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
218.01k
119.63k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.62k
32.65k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.42k
2.52k (x0.27)
TOTAL
530.04k
229.42k (x0.43)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
12.5k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
19.05k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
4.72k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
10.3k (x0.74)
TOTAL
80.58k
46.57k (x0.58)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
74.58k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
126.96k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
31.76k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
2.5k (x0.26)
TOTAL
564.12k
235.8k (x0.42)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
22k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
19.98k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
4.57k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
11.31k (x0.88)
TOTAL
93.12k
57.85k (x0.62)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
136.69k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
135.25k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
32.76k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
2.48k (x0.23)
TOTAL
643.29k
307.18k (x0.48)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4