Core i7-12700H vs i3-8350K
Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
906eb
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
14/20
4/4
TDP
115 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
27.29k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
24.19k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
5.75k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
11.13k (x0.87)
TOTAL
93.12k
68.36k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-12700H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
107.78k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
95.93k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
22.65k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
11.26k (x1.06)
TOTAL
643.29k
237.63k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4