| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.2 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
115 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
32.74k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
27.35k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
14.23k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
27.41k (x2.14)
TOTAL
93.12k
101.73k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-12700H

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
236.69k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
202.63k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
102.8k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
11.28k (x1.07)
TOTAL
643.29k
553.41k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4