Core i7-12700H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.1 times faster than the i7-12700H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.1 times faster than the i7-12700H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-H
Phoenix
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
115 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
38.25k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
29.92k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
15.5k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
29.89k (x2.33)
TOTAL
93.12k
113.57k (x1.22)
Multithread
i7-12700H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
309.6k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
260.4k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
128.56k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
20.04k (x1.89)
TOTAL
643.29k
718.59k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4