Core i7-12700H vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.9 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.9 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
15.75k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
26.29k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
5.91k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
18.48k (x1.44)
TOTAL
93.12k
66.44k (x0.71)
Multithread
i7-12700H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
94.49k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
182.53k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
45.95k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
10.15k (x0.96)
TOTAL
643.29k
333.12k (x0.52)
Performance/W
i7-12700H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4