| | | | | | |

Core i7-12700H vs i5-12400F


Description
Both models i7-12700H and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700H gets a score of 643.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
90675
Core
Alder Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/20
6/12
TDP
115 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+6x2048 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
93.12k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
643.29k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.95k
7.43k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
19.74k
18.64k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.29k
13.15k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.97k
14.82k (x0.99)
TOTAL
55.95k
54.04k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
53.64k
36.23k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
171.15k
134.76k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.92k
84.06k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.24k
16.71k (x1.81)
TOTAL
328.95k
271.76k (x0.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.26k
24.18k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.03k
23.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
14.42k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.08k
14.87k (x1.23)
TOTAL
75.12k
77.32k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
199.99k
122.98k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
218.01k
168.77k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.62k
96.11k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.42k
16.32k (x1.73)
TOTAL
530.04k
404.19k (x0.76)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
24.24k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.18k
24.74k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
13.95k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
14.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
80.58k
77.41k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
203.61k
126.87k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
249.64k
186.48k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101.32k
92.37k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.55k
15.45k (x1.62)
TOTAL
564.12k
421.18k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
41.64k
33.85k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.48k
20.33k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.2k
10.51k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.8k
11.77k (x0.92)
TOTAL
93.12k
76.46k (x0.82)

Multithread

i7-12700H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
276.56k
174.21k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
251.6k
141.31k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
104.55k
64.86k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.58k
19.01k (x1.8)
TOTAL
643.29k
399.39k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2405 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2188 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
909 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5594 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-12700H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8859 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5422 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2808 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2724 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
19813 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4