Core i7-12700 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-12700 gets a score of 698.3 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/20
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280+4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
November 2021
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
104.01k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
698.34k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-12700
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
48.39k
17.57k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.92k
27.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
9.35k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
23.9k (x1.56)
TOTAL
104.01k
78.2k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-12700
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
415.67k
176.08k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
158.57k
219.88k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.37k
100k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
12.93k (x0.88)
TOTAL
698.34k
508.89k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i7-12700
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6395 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2440 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1683 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
226 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
10744 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-12700
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
9876 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5493 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2728 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3131 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
21227 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4