Core i7-1260P vs Ryzen 9 7950X
Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a60f12
Core
Alder Lake-P
Raphael
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM5
Cores/Threads
12/16
16/32
TDP
28 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
131072 kB
Date
February 2022
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
1597.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
40.61k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
31.82k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
16.63k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
32.28k (x2.39)
TOTAL
94.9k
121.33k (x1.28)
Multithread
i7-1260P
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
683.17k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
563.45k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
286.77k (x4.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
64.4k (x4.42)
TOTAL
391.07k
1597.79k (x4.09)
Performance/W
i7-1260P
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
9399 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4