| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs Ryzen 7 5700U


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5700U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the 5700U gets 324.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.2 times faster than the 5700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
860f81
Core
Alder Lake-P
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
61.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
324.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
16.9k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
26.99k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
9.14k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
8.38k (x0.62)
TOTAL
94.9k
61.41k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-1260P

5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
115.46k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
144.12k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
60.27k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
5.07k (x0.35)
TOTAL
391.07k
324.93k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
7697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
9608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
4018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
21662 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
3929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
6278 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
1948 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
14280 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4