| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i3-13100F


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
b06f5
Core
Alder Lake-P
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
28 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
47.14k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
25.77k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
13.25k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
14.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
94.9k
100.94k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
168.51k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
142.8k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
63.57k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
15.34k (x1.05)
TOTAL
391.07k
390.23k (x1)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4