Core i7-1260P vs i5-12400F
Description
Both models i7-1260P and i5-12400F are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
90675
Core
Alder Lake-P
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
28 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
33.85k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
20.33k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
10.51k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
11.77k (x0.87)
TOTAL
94.9k
76.46k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-1260P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
174.21k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
141.31k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
64.86k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
19.01k (x1.3)
TOTAL
391.07k
399.39k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i7-1260P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4