| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806c2
Core
Alder Lake-P
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
30.89k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
25.57k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
10.64k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
15.66k (x1.16)
TOTAL
94.9k
82.77k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
96.34k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
95.75k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
32.29k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
15.2k (x1.04)
TOTAL
391.07k
239.58k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4