| | | | | | |

Core i7-1260P vs i7-11700F


Description
The i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1260P gets a score of 391.1 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0671
Core
Alder Lake-P
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280+8x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
94.9k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
391.07k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1260P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
41.94k
32.55k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
26.81k
26.95k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.63k
10.76k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.51k
19.32k (x1.43)
TOTAL
94.9k
89.58k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-1260P

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
168.12k
232.06k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
148.09k
203.56k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.28k
72.89k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.58k
3.81k (x0.26)
TOTAL
391.07k
512.32k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i7-1260P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6004 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5289 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
13967 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1260P
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
8924 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2687 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2875 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
20191 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4