| | | | | | |

Core i7-1255U vs i7-10510U


Description
The i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1255U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.73k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
258.31k points
190.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1255U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.32k
22.85k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.35k
21.15k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.2k
4.78k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.86k
10.24k (x0.94)
TOTAL
81.73k
59.01k (x0.72)

Multithread

i7-1255U

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.48k
86.08k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
100.18k
79.78k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.39k
18.26k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.26k
6.69k (x0.72)
TOTAL
258.31k
190.82k (x0.74)

Performance/W
i7-1255U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
7032 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6678 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2893 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
617 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
17221 points/W
12721 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1255U
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
8154 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2382 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2311 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
17390 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4