Core i7-1255U vs i5-4690
Description
The i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1255U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1255U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
306c3
Core
Alder Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.73k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
258.31k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1255U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
38.32k
22.97k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.35k
13.02k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.2k
5.21k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.86k
4.74k (x0.44)
TOTAL
81.73k
45.95k (x0.56)
Multithread
i7-1255U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
105.48k
85.98k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
100.18k
49.01k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.39k
19.5k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.26k
9.46k (x1.02)
TOTAL
258.31k
163.95k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i7-1255U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
7032 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6678 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2893 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
617 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
17221 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1255U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
8154 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2382 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2311 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
17390 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4