| | | | | | |

Core i7-1255U vs i5-10400T


Description
The i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1255U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.73k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
258.31k points
307.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1255U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.32k
22k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
21.35k
19.98k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.2k
4.57k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.86k
11.31k (x1.04)
TOTAL
81.73k
57.85k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-1255U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
105.48k
136.69k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
100.18k
135.25k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.39k
32.76k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.26k
2.48k (x0.27)
TOTAL
258.31k
307.18k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i7-1255U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7032 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6678 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2893 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
617 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
17221 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1255U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8154 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2382 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2311 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
17390 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4