Core i7-1255U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1255U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1255U gets a score of 258.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1255U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.73k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
258.31k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1255U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
38.32k
14.08k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
21.35k
22.56k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.2k
5.19k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.86k
16.71k (x1.54)
TOTAL
81.73k
58.53k (x0.72)
Multithread
i7-1255U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
105.48k
86.62k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
100.18k
168.1k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.39k
43.51k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.26k
5.16k (x0.56)
TOTAL
258.31k
303.4k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i7-1255U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
7032 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6678 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2893 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
617 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
17221 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1255U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
8154 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2382 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2311 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
17390 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4