| | | | | | |

Core i5-12600K vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i5-12600K is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12600K gets a score of 764.7 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.7 times faster than the i5-12600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a60f12
Core
Arder Lake-S
Dragon Range
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
65536 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
111.14k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
764.68k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12600K
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
52.6k
37.43k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
27.28k
30.7k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
15.16k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.4k
29.78k (x1.82)
TOTAL
111.14k
113.07k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-12600K

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
356.58k
556.68k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
263.15k
482.32k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.87k
225.46k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.08k
49.48k (x2.74)
TOTAL
764.68k
1313.94k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i5-12600K
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5486 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4048 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
11764 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12600K
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10735 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5568 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3033 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3346 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
22682 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4