| | | | | | |

Core i5-12600K vs i9-13980HX


Description
The i5-12600K is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12600K gets a score of 764.7 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.7 times faster than the i5-12600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
b0671
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
111.14k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
764.68k points
1317.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12600K
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
52.6k
54.07k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
27.28k
30.22k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
15.67k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.4k
16.09k (x0.98)
TOTAL
111.14k
116.05k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-12600K

i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
356.58k
597.18k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
263.15k
466.55k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.87k
225.13k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.08k
28.67k (x1.59)
TOTAL
764.68k
1317.53k (x1.72)

Performance/W
i5-12600K
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5486 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4048 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
278 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
11764 points/W
23955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12600K
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10735 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5568 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3033 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3346 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
22682 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4