| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
50657
Core
Alder Lake-H
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8448 kB
Date
February 2022
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.97k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
14.5k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.78k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
8.19k (x1)
TOTAL
43.33k
31.45k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-12500H

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
15.56k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
59.23k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
22.87k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.85k (x1.13)
TOTAL
128.45k
104.51k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
25.09k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
20.76k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
5.07k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
8.76k (x1.04)
TOTAL
58.37k
59.68k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-12500H

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
111.43k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
100.2k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
24.67k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.89k (x1.13)
TOTAL
225.65k
243.18k (x1.08)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4