Core i5-12500H vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 194.2 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.7 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 194.2 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.7 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
106a5
Core
Alder Lake-H
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
12/16
4 /8
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
7.35k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
4.89k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
2.9k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
2.82k (x0.35)
TOTAL
59.33k
17.96k (x0.3)
Multithread
i5-12500H
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
29.69k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
22.26k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
14.91k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
6.29k (x1.05)
TOTAL
194.25k
73.16k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1357 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1913 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4317 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
4873 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4175 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2334 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1802 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
13184 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4