Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
206d7
Core
Alder Lake-H
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
12/16
8 /16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
8.76k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
7.35k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
3.86k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
3.32k (x0.43)
TOTAL
57.97k
23.28k (x0.4)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
78.51k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
66.46k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
36.42k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
3.88k (x0.65)
TOTAL
201.2k
185.26k (x0.92)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1365 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2081 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
4471 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
4692 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4357 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2119 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
12883 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4