Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
12/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.52k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
8.68k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
2.83k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
3.13k (x0.38)
TOTAL
43.33k
18.17k (x0.42)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
32.7k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
105.18k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
35.18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
9.54k (x1.57)
TOTAL
128.45k
182.59k (x1.42)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
11.08k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
9.57k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
3.18k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
3.28k (x0.4)
TOTAL
59.33k
27.11k (x0.46)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
139.07k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
133.47k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
46.6k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
6.65k (x1.11)
TOTAL
194.25k
325.78k (x1.68)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
11.18k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
10.06k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
3.21k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
3.12k (x0.4)
TOTAL
57.97k
27.57k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
140.98k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
145.37k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
45.62k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
6.75k (x1.12)
TOTAL
201.2k
338.73k (x1.68)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
18.62k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
10.49k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.04k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
3.26k (x0.39)
TOTAL
58.37k
36.41k (x0.62)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
236.25k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
151.05k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
58.9k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.7k (x1.1)
TOTAL
225.65k
452.9k (x2.01)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4