Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E3-1270 v2
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 201.2 k points while the E3-1270 v2 gets 139.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
306a9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ivy Bridge-H2
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
12/16
4 /8
TDP
45 W
69 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2022
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
36.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
139.38k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
13.16k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
12.51k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
5k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
5.62k (x0.73)
TOTAL
57.97k
36.29k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-12500H
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
51.89k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
57.35k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
23.74k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
6.4k (x1.07)
TOTAL
201.2k
139.38k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1365 points/W
752 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2081 points/W
831 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
891 points/W
344 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4471 points/W
2020 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
E3-1270 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4692 points/GHz
3374 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4357 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2119 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1715 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
12883 points/GHz
9304 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4