Core i5-12500H vs Pentium G4560
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 194.2 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.2 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 194.2 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.2 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
906e9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
12/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2022
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
13.01k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
18.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
5.06k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
7.4k (x0.91)
TOTAL
59.33k
44.21k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-12500H
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
27.22k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
43.79k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
11.74k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
7.16k (x1.19)
TOTAL
194.25k
89.91k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1357 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1913 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
913 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
4317 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
4873 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4175 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2334 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1802 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
13184 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4