| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.3 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
5k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
20.22k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
6.54k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
13.78k (x1.69)
TOTAL
43.33k
45.53k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
36.39k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
166.55k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
54.92k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.96k (x1.47)
TOTAL
128.45k
266.82k (x2.08)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
18.03k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
25.98k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
6.86k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
14.5k (x1.79)
TOTAL
59.33k
65.37k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
131.34k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
204.76k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
55.74k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
8.99k (x1.49)
TOTAL
194.25k
400.83k (x2.06)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
17.98k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
27.04k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
6.63k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
13.6k (x1.76)
TOTAL
57.97k
65.24k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
130.88k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
208.5k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
54.12k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
8.91k (x1.48)
TOTAL
201.2k
402.41k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
32.08k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
28.17k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
6.68k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
14.98k (x1.78)
TOTAL
58.37k
81.91k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
242.98k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
220.16k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
53.97k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
12.22k (x2.01)
TOTAL
225.65k
529.32k (x2.35)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4