| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-8250U


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806ea
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
153.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.32k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
13.5k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.11k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.42k (x0.91)
TOTAL
43.33k
28.34k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
13.97k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
50.8k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
14.71k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.76k (x0.78)
TOTAL
128.45k
84.24k (x0.66)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
12.41k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
18.11k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
4.79k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
8.16k (x1.01)
TOTAL
59.33k
43.46k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
42.48k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
60.2k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
14.85k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
4.77k (x0.79)
TOTAL
194.25k
122.3k (x0.63)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
12.59k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
18.89k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.65k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
8.2k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.97k
44.32k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
45.91k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
69.55k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
16.79k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
4.83k (x0.8)
TOTAL
201.2k
137.09k (x0.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
22k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
19.55k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.41k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
7.83k (x0.93)
TOTAL
58.37k
53.8k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
70.15k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
63.27k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
15.29k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.8k (x0.79)
TOTAL
225.65k
153.5k (x0.68)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
4676 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
4218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
1019 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
10233 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2304 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
15823 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4