| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-7500


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906e9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
191.71k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.87k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
16.09k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
5.11k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.97k (x0.98)
TOTAL
43.33k
33.04k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
14.81k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
61.51k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
19.59k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.68k (x0.61)
TOTAL
128.45k
99.59k (x0.78)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
14.09k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
19.8k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
5.34k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
8.45k (x1.04)
TOTAL
59.33k
47.67k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
53.99k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
77.43k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
20.81k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
2.53k (x0.42)
TOTAL
194.25k
154.77k (x0.8)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
14.03k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
21.07k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
5.15k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
7.77k (x1.01)
TOTAL
57.97k
48.03k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
50.12k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
74.8k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
19.69k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
5.19k (x0.86)
TOTAL
201.2k
149.79k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
25.59k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
22.57k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
5.27k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
8.08k (x0.96)
TOTAL
58.37k
61.51k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
88.3k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
78.59k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
19.72k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.1k (x0.84)
TOTAL
225.65k
191.71k (x0.85)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4