| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-7400


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
906e9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
173.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
12.72k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
19.3k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.76k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
8.73k (x1.13)
TOTAL
57.97k
45.52k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
47.95k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
71.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
17.22k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
8.03k (x1.34)
TOTAL
201.2k
145.18k (x0.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
22.37k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
19.46k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.44k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
6.41k (x0.76)
TOTAL
58.37k
52.69k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
79.57k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
71.41k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
16.44k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.27k (x1.03)
TOTAL
225.65k
173.7k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4