| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-7200U


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
806e9
Core
Alder Lake-H
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
12/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2022
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
97.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
3.15k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
12.85k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.14k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
5.21k (x0.64)
TOTAL
43.33k
25.36k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
6.28k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
29.27k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
9.31k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.71k (x0.77)
TOTAL
128.45k
49.56k (x0.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
11.39k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
16.47k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
4.36k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
5.21k (x0.64)
TOTAL
59.33k
37.43k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
23.57k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
37.4k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
10.15k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
4.78k (x0.79)
TOTAL
194.25k
75.9k (x0.39)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
11.36k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
17.26k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.03k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
4.77k (x0.62)
TOTAL
57.97k
37.42k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
24.08k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
41.23k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
10.19k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
4.72k (x0.79)
TOTAL
201.2k
80.22k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
19.34k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
17.47k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.08k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
4.04k (x0.48)
TOTAL
58.37k
44.94k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
42.86k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
41.3k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
9.69k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.68k (x0.6)
TOTAL
225.65k
97.52k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4