Core i5-12500H vs i5-4690
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
306c3
Core
Alder Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
22.97k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
13.02k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
5.21k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
4.74k (x0.56)
TOTAL
58.37k
45.95k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
85.98k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
49.01k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
19.5k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
9.46k (x1.56)
TOTAL
225.65k
163.95k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4