Core i5-12500H vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.4 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
4k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
14.19k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
4.62k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
11.03k (x1.35)
TOTAL
43.33k
33.84k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
22.77k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
96.59k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
31.65k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
2.45k (x0.4)
TOTAL
128.45k
153.46k (x1.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
12.61k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
17.94k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
4.83k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
10.81k (x1.33)
TOTAL
59.33k
46.19k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
74.62k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
119.63k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
32.65k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
2.52k (x0.42)
TOTAL
194.25k
229.42k (x1.18)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
12.5k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
19.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
4.72k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
10.3k (x1.33)
TOTAL
57.97k
46.57k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
74.58k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
126.96k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
31.76k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
2.5k (x0.42)
TOTAL
201.2k
235.8k (x1.17)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
22k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
19.98k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.57k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
11.31k (x1.35)
TOTAL
58.37k
57.85k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
136.69k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
135.25k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
32.76k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
2.48k (x0.41)
TOTAL
225.65k
307.18k (x1.36)
Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4