| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.6 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
4.3k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
16.56k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
5.25k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
12.61k (x1.54)
TOTAL
43.33k
38.72k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
18.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
79.16k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
26.75k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
13.81k (x2.27)
TOTAL
128.45k
137.82k (x1.07)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
26.28k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
23.38k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
5.52k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
12.96k (x1.54)
TOTAL
58.37k
68.14k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
163.67k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
159.74k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
39k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
7.56k (x1.24)
TOTAL
225.65k
369.97k (x1.64)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4