| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
706e5
Core
Alder Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
12/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.93k
4.05k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.76k
15.29k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.46k
9.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
10.54k (x1.29)
TOTAL
43.33k
38.92k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.04k
9.05k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
66.78k
33.88k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.55k
15.34k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.74k (x1.11)
TOTAL
128.45k
65.01k (x0.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.93k
7.07k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
10.55k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.5k
5.27k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
5.66k (x0.7)
TOTAL
59.33k
28.56k (x0.48)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
61.07k
25.28k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
86.08k
37.48k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.08k
17.77k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.02k
6.92k (x1.15)
TOTAL
194.25k
87.45k (x0.45)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
13.9k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
20.13k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
9.41k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
10.59k (x1.37)
TOTAL
57.97k
54.03k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
55.4k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
59.01k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
22.83k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
6.7k (x1.11)
TOTAL
201.2k
143.94k (x0.72)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
25.53k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
19.99k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
9.31k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
10.81k (x1.29)
TOTAL
58.37k
65.64k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-12500H

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
58.46k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
57.31k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
20.1k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.81k (x1.12)
TOTAL
225.65k
142.69k (x0.63)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4